Best Malware Removal and Protection Software."In two of our three tests, Firefox did finish leaner, but in no case did it live up to Mozilla's claim that Quantum consumes 'roughly 30 percent less RAM than Chrome,'" reports Laptop Mag.īoth browsers launched within 0.302 seconds, and the article concludes that "no matter which browser you choose, you're getting one that's decently fast and capable when both handle all of the content you're likely to encounter during your regular surfing sessions. In a series RAM-usage tests, Chrome's average score showed it used "marginally" less memory, though the average can be misleading. Chrome's was 35,622 to Firefox's 35,148 - a win, if only a minuscule one. This JavaScript benchmark runs 21 individual tests (over such functions as core language features, bit and math operations, strings and arrays, and more) and combines the results into a single score. You might think that Octane 2.0, which started out as a Google Developers project, would favor Chrome - and you'd be (slightly) right. Whereas Firefox performed noticeably better on the Organize Album and Explore DNA Sequencing workloads, Chrome proved more adept at Photo Enhancement and Local Notes, demonstrating that the two browsers have different strengths. Now Laptop Mag has run more tests, agreeing that Firefox performs beter on JetStream tests - and on WebXPRT's six HTML5- and JavaScript-based workload tests.įirefox Quantum was the winner here, with a score of 491 (from an average of five runs, with the highest and lowest results tossed out) to Chrome's 460 - but that wasn't quite the whole story. Mashable aleady reported Firefox Quantum performs better than Chrome on web applications (based on BrowserBench's JetStream tests), but that Chrome performed better on other benchmarks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |